In this posting we examine some consequences of words spoken.
Words can manipulate people into taken actions that they may not have done normally. Much like mass hypnosis’. This strategy is evident in various domains, including politics.
Repetition of a message doesn't inherently validate its veracity, as history demonstrates. The manipulation of information resembles historical instances, such as the marketing tactics of the Nazi regime under Heinrich Himmler, which culminated in tragic consequences. He kept repeating a particular mantra that everyone accepted as true, which led to the deaths of Jews, gypsies, and even native Germans that weren’t perfect. All under the guise of creating a perfect race.
Thankfully, we stand far from those extreme circumstances in present-day America. Nevertheless, it remains imperative to discern and accept the truth within the messages we receive, rather than deny them. A contemporary example of this struggle is the climate change debate that went on a few years back. While some deny its existence, the consequences of our actions may already be irreversible. Our pursuit of profit and comfort sometimes hampers necessary change, paralleling our approach to battling cancer—a condition tied to chemical mutations that are pervasive in our modern environment. It is some of the 10,000 chemicals in the environment that cause cellular mutations, aka, cancer.
To combat such issues, a shift towards embracing natural remedies is crucial. Rather than succumbing to the allure of pharmaceutical commercials, we should focus on nutrient-rich alternatives to promote the body's innate healing abilities. This entails being critical of the food industry's impact on health, asseen in sugary cereals and their adverse effects on children's health.
Ultimately, the key is to listen keenly to both what is being presented to you, so you can hear the ruth, or the lie, behind it; and your quiet inner voice, separate from external influences. In upcoming posts, we will delve into the sense of smell, which serves as another tool for discerning the authenticity of information presented to us